Sunday, April 15, 2007

NYC: light years away...or one of the pack?

THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT THE GREATNESS OF N.Y.C.. A GREATNESS TOO EVIDENT TO EVEN BE DISCUSSED. THIS THREAD IS ABOUT HOW N.Y.C. FITS IN WITH ITS FELLOW U.S. CITIES.


You get a sense from many forumers on this board that New York City is in a category of its own, an incomparable place that divides American cities into two groups:

• New York

• others

In other words, "A-#-1, king of the hill, top of the heap", leaving even cities like LA, Chgo, SF, and Boston in its dust.

As an American, do you see New York City in such a light....the star above all others in some sort of a hierarchial rating system?

-or-

Do you preceive that in the last half century, that total control that New York seemed to have had over every aspect of US life (save for government.... and that one it often shared with DC behind the scenes anyway) has been reduced, that power has spead out greatly from its old Eastern Establishment (Bowash) days, that our cities in the last half century have been invigorated with a sophistication unknown to them prior to WWII...so that New York, while still our greatest city, needs to be spoken of in the same breath as other US cities?

So, which is it...New York leaves the pack in its dust, or that one is an old paradigm: other US cities have grown too sophisticated, have been acquired too many ammentiies, too many aspects of quality urbanism that no city, even New York, is immune from being grouped with the others?>

Abandoned Municipal Projects

>

Do you see any hope for the Rust Belt?

This region has been decaying for decades now, and recent attempts to clean things up haven't been all to successful. Is there any hope for these cities?>

CBD Tornado's

I reall hope someone can give me some insight on what happened to downtowns when a tornado struck the premises. For instance, Oklahoma city...if i recall, a twister struck the CBD a few years back but i never saw any damaged photos. I cant remember any other large cities getting hit except milwaukee near the airport and minneapolis in the suburbs. How do the buildings stand up against the tornado when it enters within proximity. N.O. downtown had countless windows blow out in their towers after the hurricane struck. I love to make the connection with weather and how architects design buildings to withstand such impact. SF is an example of a big city constructing buildings that prevent collapses from earthquakes. What ever happened to OKC that day of the tornado! Some one fill me in and discuss>

A Misfit ahead of "His" Time

Misfit S.F. is just ahead of its time
Joan Ryan

Thursday, March 2, 2006

It is said that we never really leave high school. The workplace is high school with cubicles. Our neighborhoods are high school with cocktail parties.

When I heard about the San Francisco Board of Supes passing a resolution this week calling for the impeachment of the president, a move that followed one of the supes dismissing on national television the need for a standing military, I suddenly had an image of a high school made up of all the major cities in the country.

Just as every student plays a role in the dynamic of a school, so does every big city in the dynamic of a country.

Los Angeles is the cheerleader with the nose job and the Juicy Couture tank top. Chicago is the good-natured linebacker who is the go-to guy when a keg needs tapping and isn't above stuffing the ballot box to become class president.

San Francisco is the odd kid in the back row of the classroom in the tattered vintage jeans and fuchsia scarf with a streak of orange in his hair. He doesn't wear leather and explains with the verve of an evangelist why not.

He is of ambiguous sexual orientation and ethnicity, though there's a clear Asian influence. He has amazing bone structure. He is trim and elegant without being too polished. He carries himself the way people do who know they are beautiful. But he doesn't make any particular effort to look good. That would be shallow and, in his book, shallowness is about the most serious sin.

He sees himself as an intellectual, someone who is compassionate and sophisticated, well read and well traveled, socially conscious and politically enlightened. That not everyone sees him in the same way is of no concern to him. There is no question in his mind that they are wrong, and he is right.

Not surprisingly, he has opinions about everything, and shares them without reservation and without worrying what anyone thinks of him.

Indeed, there is often more than a hint of condescension in his opinions, as if he is trying his best to be patient while everyone else catches up to his forward thinking. He has reason to feel a little smug. Many of his ideas that seemed radical when first presented -- recycling garbage, for instance, or banning pesticides from playing fields -- eventually became commonplace.


The Fuschia Scarf

He's the one at the school who speaks up for the gays and lesbians, the nerds and hippies, the outcasts and losers. He's the one who organizes a boycott of the cafeteria until it serves only organic and free-trade products, who collects food and winter jackets for the homeless and who spearheads a recall of the principal.

Sometimes people dismiss him as a kook or even a freak, but he never doubts the rightness of his beliefs. He thinks he can change the world, despite all evidence to the contrary. For instance, he thinks he can get the white kids, black kids and Asian kids to mix into one happy, integrated student body. But despite all his efforts and his social theories, each group separates itself from the others, retreating to its own table in the lunchroom.

Some find his idealism refreshing and essential; others think it's childish, impractical and mind-numbingly predictable.

In truth, he struggles with consistency. He is a committed vegan until he reads the menu at Gary Dankos. He marches in every anti-whatever parade, unless it conflicts with his trips to Squaw or Kona. He believes deeply in tolerance but shouts down Republican classmates.

Few question, however, his facile and unconventional mind. He challenges accepted wisdom. So he blows everyone away with his science-fair projects and multimedia book reports, but he barely passes the courses he considers stupid and irrelevant -- "the old paradigm," he says. He wants to break new ground, invent things no one else has thought possible.

He can take himself too seriously sometimes, but he is also a load of fun. He'll try anything, go anywhere, meet anyone. He can be irreverent and silly.

He is the only child -- a little self-centered, a little indulged -- of a gracious, wealthy mother and a raconteur father. So he can tie a Windsor knot and box the favorite in the sixth at Golden Gate Fields. He can deliver the most elegant toasts and tell the bawdiest jokes. He's equally comfortable at opening night at the ballet and Halloween in the Castro.

In a high school populated by major cities, San Francisco is the wild but likable radical. He's nutty, rebellious, smart, indulgent, arrogant, funny, gorgeous. And as much as his classmates ridicule his crazy ideas and out-there opinions, more times than not, the weird kid in the back of the room with the fuchsia scarf is on to something.

E-mail Joan Ryan at joanryan@sfchronicle.com. Her column runs on Thursdays while she on assignment.

Page B ->

Bush Government pays people to marry

It's true. The so-called "Republicans" are paying couples to get married. That's YOUR taxpayer money paying for someone half way across the country to get married!!!>

Bush Government pays people to marry

It's true. The so-called "Republicans" are paying couples to get married. That's YOUR taxpayer money paying for someone half way across the country to get married!!!>